고려대학교

초록/요약

From the early days of the People's Republic of China, the party-state has dominated the management of public spaces. The private organizations that participated in the operation of the park or the organizations that engaged in public activities within the park disappeared, and the governmental park management organization replaced them. It can also be seen through the theme of managing public spaces that party-state has an inclination to minimize autonomous areas. The question is how the party-state’s exclusive management of public spaces has worked. Was there an improvement in the park's openness and accessibility? Although it is difficult to say that the park's openness has been reduced, it can be fully confirmed that its focus on financial considerations and production has been an important constraint on enhancing the park's openness. There was no financial capacity for the party-state to provide public support in public space, and the public space issue was not a priority for the party-state. In the operation of public spaces, financial independence was emphasized beyond publicness. The slogan “self-sufficiency” appeared until the 1980s, calling it a temporary policy, but as a result, it was maintained for a long time. From the characteristics of park management, it would be hard to affirm that the monopolistic control of the party-state public space had a positive effect on the enhancement of publicness.