Deliberating Among Impartial Spectators: Rhetoric, Emotions, and Deliberative Democracy in Adam Smith
- 주제(키워드) 심의민주주의 , 감정의 정치 , 도덕감정론 , 아담스미스
- 발행기관 고려대학교 대학원
- 지도교수 김남국
- 발행년도 2017
- 학위수여년월 2017. 8
- 학위구분 석사
- 학과 대학원 정치외교학과
- 세부전공 정치사상 전공
- 원문페이지 87 p
- 실제URI http://www.dcollection.net/handler/korea/000000077193
- 본문언어 영어
- 제출원본 000045915908
초록/요약
Romantic responses to the ‘Kantian,’ reason-based deliberative democratic theories contend that the narrow conceptual scope of deliberation proposed by the opponents inadequately restrict the scope of democracy itself. In remedial response, the hitherto assertions of the Romantics have focused on the viability and significance of the role of affect as means to widen the conceptual scope of deliberation. However, investigations on the social phenomenology of the Romantic procedures in deliberative democracy are still rather barren for the short history of inquiry itself. Under the belief that broadening of scope for the study of Romanticist deliberative democracy ought to be taken via borrowing from the thoughts of the great minds in history, this paper seeks to further the scope of this reactionary discourse by proposing an alternative analysis. A strand of study originally dependent on the thoughts of Aristotle, Cicero, and Hume, Romanticist theories lacked explanatory power in explaining the social aspect of deliberation via affect. Borrowing from the concept of ‘impartial spectator’ and ‘mutual sympathy,’ this dissertation seeks to theorize the affective interactions among individual actors at the social level in deliberative democratic setting from a Smithian perspective. Aristotelian and Ciceronian thoughts provide great insights into the mechanism of rhetorical exchanges of affect but are not sufficiently interpreted to provide the mechanism of mutual and social exchanges of affect. In remedy, this paper seeks to resort to Smith’s The Theory of Moral Sentiment and supplement what began from Hume’s idea on how mutual deliberation of affect can take place socially and provide a viable application for the current Romanticist discourse on deliberative democracy.
more목차
1. Introduction 1
1. Background 1
2. Inquiry 4
3. Terminology 6
2. Two Theories of Deliberative Democracy 12
1. Rationalism 12
2. Romanticism 15
3. Romanticist Theories and their Limitations 20
1) Aristotle 20
2) Cicero 25
3. Humean Alternative 33
1. Hume's Theory of Moral Sentiment 33
2. Application and Limitations 39
4. Smithian Alternative 42
1. Phenomenology and Moral Psychology 42
2. Impartial Spectator and Ethical Self-Formation 46
3. Mutual Sympathy via Rhetorical Deliberation 53
5. Smith on Romanticist Theory of Deliberative Democracy 60
1. Political Affect in the Social Context 60
2. General Will of Society 67
6. Conclusion 71
References 75
