An Analysis of Seoul Urban Development Policies from 2000s : Focused on Socially Sustainable Urban Development
- 주제(키워드) Urban Development , Socially Sustainable Development , Modernism Architecture Movement , Seoul New Town Project
- 발행기관 고려대학교 국제대학원
- 지도교수 James William Potter
- 발행년도 2017
- 학위수여년월 2017. 2
- 학위구분 석사
- 학과 국제대학원 국제학과
- 원문페이지 52 p
- 실제URI http://www.dcollection.net/handler/korea/000000073034
- 본문언어 영어
- 제출원본 000045898025
초록/요약
This thesis aims to discuss the 20th century Modernism Architecture Movement and current urban development policies of Seoul based on socially sustainable development. Based on analysis of 20th century modernism architecture movement, represented by Le Corbusier, the radiant city and its failure, attempts to identify what socially sustainable development is and which are its important principles by Barron and Gauntlett (2002). As a result of the analysis, this study shows current Seoul urban redevelopment policy, New Town Projects is not a socially sustainable development. In this regard, this study suggests needs of qualitative development instead of only quantitative development focused on capital. It gives implication to the next Seoul urban development policy, such as 104 village urban regeneration policy, needs a socially sustainable development, and it should be implemented differentiate strategies by districts and its social and cultural heritage.
more목차
Table of Contents
1. Introduction 1
2. Modernism Architecture Movement 4
2.1. The 20th century Modern Architecture Movement 6
2.2. Refutations of Modern Architecture Movement 8
3. Socially Sustainable Urban Development 11
3.1. Sustainable Development 11
3.2. Socially Sustainable Development 13
4. The Urban Development of Seoul 16
4.1. Current History of Urban Development in Seoul 16
4.2. Problems of Seoul Urban Development 22
4.2.1. Focused on Quantitative Development 22
4.2.2. Urban Decline in Seoul 23
4.3. Seoul New Town Project 27
4.3.1. Analysis by Socially Sustainable Development Five Principles 29
5. A Movement from Urban Redevelopment to Urban Regeneration 33
5.1. Current Urban Regeneration Policy on 104 Village 34
6. Conclusion 38
Bibliography 41
