검색 상세

한국 국가-기업 관계의 변동 : 벤처기업 지원정책을 중심으로

The Change of State Business Relations in Korea: Focused on venture Business Supporting Policy

  • 이종훈 (Lee, Jong Hun, 대학원 사회학과 사회학전공)

초록/요약

This dissertation analyses venture business supporting policy of Kim Dae Jung's and Park Geun Hye's Government to investigate the impact coming form the change of state-business relations in Korea based on Linda Weiss's "Governed Interdependence" Theory. The dissertation try to build causal mechanism within Weiss's analysing frame by inserting 'a theory of fields'. the distance and the direction of impact between state field and business fields are able to make causality within state-business relations, the type of governed interdependence and state capacity. Also, it brings historical change of state-business relations into the center of developmental state's dismantlement and reorganization debates. Korea has experienced dismantling and reorganizing developmental state in the middle of fluctuation within world system and internal political-economical situations. As a result, state-business relation in Korea has been changed from hierarchical state-centric formation to collaborative decentralization. range of discretion belonging to private sector, especially business own, has been much bigger than before. It became the core element of state capacity to bring businesses on particular state projects, the plan of structural change and the emergent of industries. Venture industry and its businesses were selected by state as partner of ongoing state's goal to attain it, such as restructuring industry, securing new growth power, and creating employment, and the state took private initiative from ventures to actualizing these because autonomy, legitimacy and compelling power of state to take chaebol into those were much more limited than before. these series of change have been led to rise of different types of governed interdependence expressed as supporing policies and made them more cooperative forms than those of developmental state era.

more

목차

목 차


제1장. 서론 ·············································································· 1
제1절. 문제제기 ········································································ 1
제2절. 연구대상 및 연구방법 ···················································· 5
1. 연구대상 ·············································································· 5
2. 연구방법 ············································································ 10
제3절. 논문의 구성 ·································································· 11

제2장. 이론적 자원과 분석틀 ············································· 12
제1절. 선행연구 검토 ······························································· 12
1. 선행연구의 특징: 발전국가로부터의 경로의존성 ··················· 12
2. 선행연구의 한계 ································································ 15
제2절. 이론적 자원 ·································································· 16
1. 발전국가에 대한 논의: 국가자율성과 국가능력 ······················ 16
2. 장 이론: ‘전략적 행위의 장’으로서의 벤처시장 ······················ 24
(1) 장 이론 ·········································································· 24
(2) 장의 구분 ······································································· 26
(3) 이론적 기여 ···································································· 28
제3절. 분석틀 ··········································································· 29

제3장. 발전국가의 위기와 재편 ········································· 33
제1절. 발전국가의 위기: 1980년대의 ‘자율화’ ··························· 33
1. 세계체제적 측면 ·································································· 34
2. 국가-시민사회의 측면 ·························································· 37
3. 국가-기업(자본)관계의 측면 ················································· 38
제2절. 위기의 심화, 발전국가의 재편: 1990년대의 ‘자유화’ 그리고 외환위기 ······························································· 42
1. 노태우 정부: 위기의 심화 ···················································· 42
2. 김영삼 정부: 재편된 발전국가, 도래한 외환위기 ···················· 43
제3절. 소결 ·············································································· 47

제4장. 김대중 정부의 벤처기업 지원정책과 국가기업 관계 ······························································································· 48
제1절. 정부방침의 정치경제적 배경: 김대중 정부 ···················· 48
제2절. 김대중 정부의 벤처기업 지원정책과 국가-기업 관계
······························································································· 50
1. 김대중 정부의 벤처기업 지원정책 ········································· 50
(1) 핵심정책: ‘벤처기업법’과 ‘코스닥 시장 활성화 방안’ ·················· 50
(2) 정책의 결과 ······································································ 54
2. 관료제적 속성: 선도기구의 부재, 상충하는 자율성 ················· 55
3. 국가-기업 관계: ‘산업부문’과 ‘결사체’로서의 기업 ·················· 58
제3절. 국가능력과 관리된 상호의존: 점진적 국가과잉 ············· 61
5장. 박근혜 정부의 벤처기업 지원정책과 국가-기업 관계 ······························································································· 64
제1절. 정부방침의 정치경제적 배경: 박근혜 정부 ···················· 64
제2절. 박근혜 정부의 벤처기업 지원정책과 국가-기업 관계
······························································································· 67
1. 박근혜 정부의 벤처기업 지원정책 ········································· 67
(1) 핵심정책: 경제혁신 3개년 개획 ············································· 67
(2) 정책의 결과 ······································································ 72
2. 관료제적 속성: 고도의 분권화, 전문성의 강화? ······················ 75
3. 국가-기업 관계: ‘네트워크’로서의 기업 ·································· 76
제3절. 국가능력과 관리된 상호의존: 점진적 국가종속의 가능성
······························································································· 78

제6장. 결론 ············································································· 81
제1절. 논문의 요약 ·································································· 81
제2절. 논문의 의의와 한계 ······················································ 85

참고문헌 ·················································································· 86

Abstract ·················································································· 92

more
반출 Meta View 목록