Analysis of Japan's Peacekeeping Operations : Enactment,Amendment and Future prospects
일본평화유지활동과 PKO법안 분석:입법,개정과정과 향후전망
- 주제(키워드) 일본평화유지활동 , Peacekeeping Operation , SDF dispatch , Remilitarization
- 발행기관 고려대학교 국제대학원
- 지도교수 서창록
- 발행년도 2012
- 학위수여년월 2012. 2
- 학위구분 석사
- 학과 국제대학원 국제학과
- 세부전공 국제평화안보전공
- 원문페이지 70 p
- 실제URI http://www.dcollection.net/handler/korea/000000033512
- 본문언어 영어
- 제출원본 000045692664
초록/요약
After the end of Cold War, so called second generation Peacekeeping is being focused which requires a vast financial support and a technology, Japan as one of the biggest economic powers, is needed for UN Peace keeping operation. Japan conducted its role greatly so far. However, Japanese Peace constitution restricts its Self Defense Force participation in the mission. And the restriction caused a condemnation on Japan for not sweating together. Despite of the active participation and law enactment the debates on Japanese PKO seemed not settled down yet. Since Japanese Constitution is rather stricter than those of German Basic Law which gave Germany to reinterpret their constitution. Second of all, Japan was not familiar with a concept of Collective Security like Germany joined the NATO. Lastly, even after enact the law which allowed the SDF dispatch abroad, further revision were suspected by neighbors for loosening the restriction on the SDF operational limit more than they need to. Hence, the purpose of the thesis is that to show how the PKO law enacted and why it brought a controversy. By doing so, this thesis would like to suggest future prospects of Japanese PKO.
more목차
Table of Contents
Acknowledgement
Abstract
List of Abbreviations
List of Tables
I. Introduction
II. Literature Review
III. Development of Peacekeeping Operation in Japan
3.1 Enactment of PKO Law
3.2 Amendment
3.2.1 1998 Amendment
3.2.2 2001 Amendment
3.2.3 Major Changes after Amendments
IV. Different Reactions to PKO in the International Community
4.1. The United States & The European Union
4.2. Asia
4.2.1 North East Asia
4.2.2 ASEAN
V. Analysis of PKO
5.1 International Factors
5.2 Regional Factors: Analyzing the Security Guide Line
5.3 Domestic Factors
5.3.1. Ozawa Commission and Neo-Conservatism
5.3.2. Various Constitutional Interpretations
5.3.3. Lack of Consensus about PKO within Nation
VI. Future Prospects of PKO
6.1 Reason of Distrust from Neighboring Countries
6.1.1 Growing Military Capability through Law Enactment
6.1.2 Lack of Regional Efforts on Human Right Issue
6.2 Debates on Japanese PKO compare to the Case of Germany
VII. Conclusion
Reference
