온라인서비스제공자의 저작권침해자 정보제공제도에 관한 연구
- 주제(키워드) 저작권 , 저작권보호 , 온라인서비스제공자 , OSP , 개인정보보호 , 한미FTA , 저작권법 , 정보제공제도
- 발행기관 고려대학교 정보경영공학전문대학원
- 지도교수 임종인
- 발행년도 2012
- 학위수여년월 2012. 2
- 학위구분 박사
- 학과 정보경영공학전문대학원 정보경영공학과
- 원문페이지 150 p
- 실제URI http://www.dcollection.net/handler/korea/000000033078
- 본문언어 한국어
- 제출원본 000045697520
초록/요약
ABSTRACT A Study on Legal Framework for Online Service Providers to Disclose Personal Information of Online Copyright Infringers Oh, Yeong Woo Graduate School of Information Management & Security Korea University Directed by Prof. Lim, Jong In December, 2011 The majority of online copyright infringement occurs on internet sites provided by Online Service Providers ("OSPs"). In the past, OSPs were often targeted in terms of legal liability simply because it is difficult to identify the actual perpetrators, i.e., the individuals that illegally copy, transmit, and distribute contents online. Even when these individuals are successfully identified and prosecuted, they are typically unable to bear the financial burden of the damages awarded to the copyright holders. Nevertheless, international treaties and laws that require OSPs to disclose such perpetrators' personal information to the copyright holders have been enacted in countries such as the U.S. and Japan as well as the EU to address situations where it is necessary for copyright holders to bring suit directly against individual perpetrators, or where access to their personal information is required, in relation to the OSPs' secondary liability, for determining the extent of the losses incurred and the reparations necessary. The Korean government has introduced similar regulations via the Free Trade Agreement between the Republic of Korea and the United States of America("KORUS FTA") on June 30, 2007. As a result, protection of privacy has become an issue, more specifically regarding the classification of applicable OSPs and the establishment of appropriate conditions and procedures when disclosing personal information. Korea and The U.S have already ratified the KORUS FTA in the second half of 2011. The KORUS FTA and the revision of Copyright Law, which is one of the accompanying bills related to the implementation of the KORUS FTA in Korea, will go into effect in the first half of 2012 at the same time, which provides legal framework for OSPs to disclose for personal information of online copyright infringers. This paper first surveys relevant regulations in the U.S., EU, and Japan, as well as the current situations and regulations in Korea. It then discusses important factors to consider when implementing new regulations on disclosure of personal information in the following order: identifying the appropriate government body to authorize such disclosure; classification of applicable OSPs; conditions and procedures required for such disclosure, cost distributions between OSPs and copyright holders; limitations of criminal remedy on copyright infringement ; the necessity of enacting self-regulation framework by OSPs in Copyright Law. Following factors should be taken into account when implementing new regulations on disclosure of personal information. First, administrative procedure is more appropriate than judicial one because it enables more profound review and expeditious remedy. Specialized agencies relating to copyright, e. g. Korea Copyright Commission, may assist the procedure. Second, all kinds of OSPs should be subject to disclosing identifying information. The passive conduit such as Internet Service Providers does not immune from the responsibility. Third, threshold requirement and procedure should be introduced for the protection of privacy and deliberate decision in disclosing identifying information, and relating to the cost addressing the disclosure of personal information, there should be an appropriate cost-sharing between OSPs and copyright holders. Fourth, after the launch of this revised copyright regulations, it is likely that copyright owners prefer criminal remedies to civil liabilities. Since it enables them to file criminal litigation more easily and frequently, it is necessary to limit criminal remedies on slight violation to prevent the side-effect. And the last, OSPs' self-regulation framework is crucial in reducing illegal digital contents distribution, thus this paper suggest that the self-regulation framework by OSPs be stipulated in copyright laws and regulations.
more목차
<목 차>
제 1 장 서 론 1
제 1 절 연구의 필요성 및 목적 1
제 2 절 연구의 범위 및 방법 6
제 2 장 이론적 배경 7
제 1 절 온라인서비스제공자의 저작권보호 책임 7
1. 개 요 7
2. 온라인서비스제공자의 개념과 유형 9
3. 온라인서비스제공자의 책임이론 15
제 2 절 온라인상의 개인정보보호 27
1. 개 요 27
2. 개인정보의 개념과 유형 28
3. 개인정보보호의 의의 및 필요성 30
4. 개인정보보호 관련 입법 동향 및 국제규범의 원칙 33
5. 우리나라의 개인정보보호 법제 39
제 3 장 주요국가의 정보제공제도 도입 동향 45
제 1 절 개 요 45
제 2 절 미 국 48
1. 디지털밀레니엄저작권법상의 정보제출명령(subpoena) 48
2. 연방민사소송규칙상의 증거개시절차(discovery)와 소환명령(subpoena) 51
제 3 절 유럽연합(EU) 55
1. 프랑스 56
2. 영 국 63
3. 독 일 72
제 4 절 일 본 74
제 4 장 우리나라의 정보제공제도 현황과 도입 필요성 77
제 1 절 우리나라의 현황 77
1. 그동안의 현황 77
2. 한미FTA 이행 저작권법령의 규정 82
제 2 절 우리나라에서의 도입 필요성 88
1. 온라인상 저작권침해의 심각성 88
2. 현행 저작권법상 단계적 대응제도의 한계 93
3. 전통적인 구제수단의 한계 100
4. Pure P2P를 통한 저작물 불법공유에 대한 규제 필요성 대두 103
제 5 장 정보제공제도 도입 쟁점과 도입 방안 108
제 1 절 정보제공 결정기관 108
제 2 절 정보제공 온라인서비스제공자의 범위 113
제 3 절 정보제공 요건․절차 및 비용분담 119
제 4 절 저작권침해 관련 형사처벌 대상범위 축소 123
제 5 절 온라인서비스제공자의 자율규제 입법화 126
제 6 장 결 론 130
참고문헌 133
Abstract 138
